Cookie Court: How My Students Practiced Judicial Review by Taste-Testing Cookies

The three branches of government are easy to memorize and hard to feel. Most students can tell you the legislative branch makes laws, the executive branch carries them out, and the judicial branch evaluates them. Ask what evaluating a law actually looks like, and the room gets quiet. So I turned my class into a court and handed out cookies.

The setup. I teach 11th grade Government and Economics at Vantage Career Center in Ohio, and I already explain the branches with a recipe. A recipe is a set of rules someone writes down and someone else has to follow. For this activity, I made that analogy something students could taste.

The law. The legislative branch makes laws. In this activity, the law was a sugar cookie recipe, written out step by step: cream the butter and sugar, add eggs and vanilla, mix in the flour, and bake at 375 degrees.

The execution. The executive branch carries out laws. Here, the executive was a bag of Amazon Grocery vanilla sandwich cookies. The question for the class was simple: did the executive carry out the recipe correctly? A store-bought sandwich cookie isn't exactly a homemade sugar cookie, and that gap gives the court something to rule on.

The ruling. The judicial branch evaluates laws, and that was my students' job. They ate the cookies and judged two things. Was the recipe a good law? Did Amazon, the executive, make it the way the law said to? That's judicial review in a form you can chew. Instead of reading about the court, every student got to act as one.

Why it works. It's concrete. "Evaluates laws" is an abstract phrase, and a cookie is not. It's memorable, too. A lot of my activities are built to create a shared memory that the actual lesson can build on, and a cookie tasting sticks. Every student can participate, because nobody needs background knowledge to have an opinion about a cookie. It also follows my rule for every game: easy to play, hard to master. Anyone can say a cookie tastes good. Separating a bad law from a bad execution takes real thinking, and that distinction is the heart of the judicial branch.

How to run it. You don't need much: a printed or projected recipe and a store-bought cookie that's close to it but not identical. Check for food allergies before you serve anything.

Step 1: Present the law. Show the recipe and connect it to the legislative branch. This is what Congress would write.

Step 2: Serve the execution. Hand out the store-bought cookies and connect them to the executive branch. This is the law as someone else carried it out.

Step 3: Hold court. Students taste and rule. These three questions keep the discussion focused:

Was the law good? Judge the recipe itself. Was it executed faithfully? Judge the cookie. What would you strike down? Name the part that fails and explain why. That last question is a good bridge to the real thing, where courts strike down laws that conflict with the Constitution.

If you want to try something like this, start with an idea that feels abstract and ask what everyday thing already works the same way. A recipe works for the branches because it has an author, a cook, and someone who tastes the results.

For more ways to make government hands-on, you can play my games for free on the games page. Try one yourself before you use it in class, and let me know how your students do.

Want to help your teachers save time with AI? Book a PD session for your school.

New ideas every week: Follow The AI Teacher Lab on Facebook.